I see now, i support him because though he has to this point failed to reach the goals i wanted, he is closer to them than the other side. They want higher t axes to support inept social programs, they want not just to rein in business but to regulate it further, and in terms of foreign policy this side is where i stand. We were not attacked by Iraq yet we fight them and claim we are justified... 60 years ago we fought Germany and it was Japan who attacked us...yes it could be said that they were allies, and Germany had to fought do to their idealism of hatred and evil...get the drift, get it but u don't have to agree. People, just like yourself, in t hose days wanted to stay out if it because it wasn't our place, but then we were attacked by someone who believes in the same ideology so we went to war with them and invaded another place where the ideology ran rampant. We don't see eye to eye, but as long as both sides want what's best rather than retaining power, we can get along...the only thing that can destroy America is America. In terms of the corruption, i hate it, but there are moves being made to fix it, and the current indictments will help to nudge the party into the right path. Your side is corrupt too, but i'm not pointing fingers. In close here is a good quote..."To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." Guess who said that one... It was George W.(by that i mean George Washington).
wow, that's ignorant, i apologize perez, this guy's ignorant. You at least have considered both sides before making your opinion. My party need change in ethics and to reduce corruption, your party needs direction and one common message. Today we sit, and tomorrow we both speak out like the days before.
2 Comments:
I see now, i support him because though he has to this point failed to reach the goals i wanted, he is closer to them than the other side. They want higher t axes to support inept social programs, they want not just to rein in business but to regulate it further, and in terms of foreign policy this side is where i stand. We were not attacked by Iraq yet we fight them and claim we are justified... 60 years ago we fought Germany and it was Japan who attacked us...yes it could be said that they were allies, and Germany had to fought do to their idealism of hatred and evil...get the drift, get it but u don't have to agree. People, just like yourself, in t hose days wanted to stay out if it because it wasn't our place, but then we were attacked by someone who believes in the same ideology so we went to war with them and invaded another place where the ideology ran rampant. We don't see eye to eye, but as long as both sides want what's best rather than retaining power, we can get along...the only thing that can destroy America is America. In terms of the corruption, i hate it, but there are moves being made to fix it, and the current indictments will help to nudge the party into the right path. Your side is corrupt too, but i'm not pointing fingers. In close here is a good quote..."To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." Guess who said that one... It was George W.(by that i mean George Washington).
wow, that's ignorant, i apologize perez, this guy's ignorant. You at least have considered both sides before making your opinion. My party need change in ethics and to reduce corruption, your party needs direction and one common message. Today we sit, and tomorrow we both speak out like the days before.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home