The War on Women Continues
Limbaugh called alleged Duke rape victim a "ho[ ]"
During the March 31 broadcast of his national syndicated radio program, Rush Limbaugh referred to the alleged victim of a rape by members of the Duke University lacrosse team as a "ho[]." During an on-air discussion with a caller, Limbaugh said that former Democratic presidential candidate Al Sharpton was "trying to figure out how he can get involved in the deal down there at Duke where the lacrosse team ... supposedly, you know, raped some, uh, hos." Limbaugh's made the comment about a recent incident in Durham, North Carolina, in which an exotic dancer was allegedly raped by three members of the Duke lacrosse team. The incident has invoked further controversy because the victim, an African-American, has alleged that her attackers used racial epithets. Prompted by another caller to apologize for his words, Limbaugh said that he had made the statement because he was "running on fumes today," and called it a "terrible slip of the tongue." But he then added that there are "some inconsistencies" in the case and rephrased his apology, telling the second caller, "I regret that you heard me say it."(Running on fumes, eh? Is that what they're calling Oxycodone these days...fumes? This guy is a pig. How dare he! HOW DARE HE refer to an alleged rape victim in that manner. Call your local stations who carry him and complain, contact his advertisers and complain....I will try to get a list of advertisers and post it. This is the voice of the Republican party?)
FULL STORY & AUDIO
10 Comments:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Posts which I deem offensive (my blog, I get to decide) - which are Anonymous will be removed. If you sign your name to it - it stays - if you're too chicken shit to stand by your own words - then it goes. (BTW Rush - this is soooooo pathetic - I know your ratings are way down but skulking around blogs posting anonymously in a lame ass attempt to redeem yourself....PATHETIC - then again perhaps its PRICELESS!!!!)
"The accuser had worked for an escort company for two months, doing one-on-one dates about three times a week."
http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/421799.html
Anyway, delete away, I don't mind. That doesn't change what the local news has reported and is already well known throughout the Raleigh-Durham area. I just find it ironic that you head your blog with that quote and then deem the facts as 'offensive'.
Think about this. Are you really helping this girl's case by denying her actual occupation? Hiding behind a lie to sooth your ego is something Bush would do.
If you truly are a sorority president, show some backbone and lead with integrity, not dishonesty.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
True, the victim's sexual history is non-admissable, however the situation that placed her in that residence on that evening is highly admissable.
My point however is this. What are the responsibilities of reporters to report the facts as opposed to couching the truth behind rhetoric? Also, how valid is public opinion when those conclusions are drawn from inaccurate and incomplete information?
I would be interested in your opinion on this article by Vanessa Gezari from the St Petersburg Times.
http://www.sptimes.com/2006/04/04/Worldandnation/Separating_truth__con.shtml
Your rant makes absolutely no sense. The link you posted is not new news and doesn't change the facts of the story I posted. The point is that Rush had no business calling an assault victim ANYTHING. Her occupation as an exotic dancer or working as an escort doesn't make her a whore OR entitle any man to put his hands on her. What she does or doesn't do for cash does not excuse the bad behavior of men. A woman can screw who she wants when she wants as often as she wants. News flash - women like sex too!!! How many men do you call whores? All those Duke boys taking sloppy seconds, thirds, forths....what are they? Men are bigger whores than any woman ever thought about being. Your post doesn't prove any point other than what lengths members of the boys club go to to justify bad behavior. This does not excuse what Rush did and I didn't post the story to 'help her case'. This story is about Rush's behavior - not hers. What lie am I hiding? The audio is there to hear - just a click away. I posted no lies. He said it. He shouldn't have - that's my opinion and one I am sure a lot of people share. I don't understand why posting a link to a factual story is somehow tied up with my ego. Sorry bud, my ego is not that fragile. YOU obviously have a problem with anyone pointing out what a PIG Rush is....you were bound and determined for me to see a news story that in your mind makes Rush's inappropriateness acceptable. Perhaps in your world.....but if you spend time listening to him no wonder your sense of propriety is screwed up...since Rush has no sense of it himself. Doesn't matter what she does for a living - she's a human being.
I'll read it tomorrow - this working girl has daytime hours in the corporate world and I have to catch some zzzzz's. I appreciate and respect your opinion although I don't see the point - and will read the other article and consider it. Thanks for commenting. (I was editing my own posts for accuracy - I tend to type sloppy when I'm sleepy)
your link didn't work...perhaps because it didn't wrap.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home